Romano-Smith, Stephanie and Roberts, James W. and Miller, Anthony and Wakefield, Caroline (2024) Theoretical explanations and the availability of information for learning via combined action observation and motor imagery: A commentary on Eaves et al. (2022). Psychological Research. ISSN 1430-2772
Text
Commentary article.docx - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 25 March 2025. Download (298kB) | Request a copy |
Abstract
The recent review by Eaves et al. (Psychological Research/Psychologische Forschung, 2022) outlines the research conducted to-date on combined action-observation and motor imagery (AOMI), and more specifically, its added benefit to learning. Of interest, these findings have been primarily attributed to the dual action simulation hypothesis, whereby AO and MI activate separable representations for action that may be later merged when they are congruent with one another. The present commentary more closely evaluates this explanation. What’s more, we offer an alternative information-based argument where the benefit to learning may be served instead by the availability of key information. Along these lines, we speculate on possible future directions including the need for a transfer design.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information and Comments: | This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-01955-8 |
Faculty / Department: | Faculty of Human and Digital Sciences > School of Health and Sport Sciences |
Depositing User: | Caroline Wakefield |
Date Deposited: | 29 May 2024 15:28 |
Last Modified: | 29 May 2024 15:28 |
URI: | https://hira.hope.ac.uk/id/eprint/4277 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |