Pathologies of professionalism: Invoking controversial dialectic and duelling aporias –‘per fas et nefas,’ through a performative courtroom drama.

Hodkinson, Alan (2021) Pathologies of professionalism: Invoking controversial dialectic and duelling aporias –‘per fas et nefas,’ through a performative courtroom drama. Critical Methodologies. ISSN 1532-7086 (Accepted for Publication)

[thumbnail of Review copy] Text (Review copy)
draft_Proof_hi.pdf - Submitted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (212kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This paper applies Schopenhauer’s stratagems to an examination of the
professional, within a performative courtroom trial of critical analysis.
The Defence submission seeks to sanctify the modern professional as a
solidifying force in society. The prosecution employs Schopenhauer’s The
Art of Being Right to bring a different definition and history to the
concept of the professional. Through this application, the author hopes
that you, the reader, might act as jury and so weigh the evidence to find
your own guilt/innocence or truth/deceit in the operationalisations of
professionalism within society

Item Type: Article
Additional Information and Comments: This is the author's peer review version of an article accepted for publication in the Sage Publication Critical Methodologies
Keywords: professional professionalism
Faculty / Department: Faculty of Arts & Humanities > School of Social Science
Depositing User: Alan Hodkinson
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2021 10:00
Last Modified: 09 Mar 2021 10:00
URI: https://hira.hope.ac.uk/id/eprint/3250

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item