Pathologies of professionalism: Invoking controversial dialectic and duelling aporias –‘per fas et nefas,’ through a performative courtroom drama.

Hodkinson, Alan (2021) Pathologies of professionalism: Invoking controversial dialectic and duelling aporias –‘per fas et nefas,’ through a performative courtroom drama. Critical Methodologies, 21 (3). ISSN 1532-7086

[thumbnail of 1532708621997585.pdf]
Preview
Text
1532708621997585.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (139kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper applies Schopenhauer’s stratagems to an examination of the
professional, within a performative courtroom trial of critical analysis.
The Defence submission seeks to sanctify the modern professional as a
solidifying force in society. The prosecution employs Schopenhauer’s The
Art of Being Right to bring a different definition and history to the
concept of the professional. Through this application, the author hopes
that you, the reader, might act as jury and so weigh the evidence to find
your own guilt/innocence or truth/deceit in the operationalisations of
professionalism within society

Item Type: Article
Additional Information and Comments: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
Keywords: professional professionalism
Faculty / Department: Faculty of Education and Social Sciences > School of Social Sciences
Depositing User: Alan Hodkinson
Date Deposited: 09 Mar 2021 10:00
Last Modified: 09 Dec 2022 12:39
URI: https://hira.hope.ac.uk/id/eprint/3250

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item