Rethinking the Structural Prevention of Mass Atrocities

McLoughlin, Stephen (2014) Rethinking the Structural Prevention of Mass Atrocities. Global Responsibility to Protect, 6 (4). pp. 407-429. ISSN 1875-9858

[img] Text
March 2014 Rethinking the Structural Prevention of Mass Atrocities.docx

Download (64kB)
Official URL: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/jo...

Abstract

Interest amongst scholars and policy decision-makers in the prevention of genocide and other mass atrocities has grown in recent years. Despite this, many have over- looked problems inherent in the commonly accepted notion of prevention. Crystalized in the Carnegie Commission’s 1997 report, ‘Preventing Deadly Conflict’, prevention has typically been understood in two parts, one addressing impending cases of violence (direct prevention) and the other focusing on the underlying causes of violence (struc- tural prevention). The concept of structural prevention is especially problematic. Commonly defined as the identification and addressing of ‘root causes’, this conceptu- alisation contains at least two limitations: first, there is an implicit assumption that root causes lead inevitably to violence, and second, there has been a tendency for international actors to decide, in general and global terms, what counts as root causes and how to ameliorate them, downplaying the role of local contexts and overlooking the preventive work of local and national actors. This article argues that the concept of structural prevention needs broadening to incorporate an understanding of the dynamic interaction between the risk that root causes pose, and locally-based mitiga- tion factors that foster resilience. Effective long-term prevention should be based – not only on identifying and ameliorating negative characteristics in countries at risk – but also on contributing to the complex management of diversity. While this makes intui- tive sense – and may in fact reflect the reality of how much preventive work is done – such an approach has not hitherto been reflected in conceptual understandings of prevention adopted by the United Nations, as well as academic researchers.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information and Comments: Additional information: This is a manuscript of an article published by Brill in Global Responsibility to Protect in December, 2014 details available online: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/10.1163/1875984x-00604004
Keywords: prevention, genocide, mass atrocities, Responsibility to Protect (R2P), resilience
Faculty / Department: Faculty of Arts & Humanities > History and Politics
Depositing User: Stephen McLoughlin
Date Deposited: 25 Oct 2016 10:30
Last Modified: 25 Oct 2016 10:30
URI: http://hira.hope.ac.uk/id/eprint/1741

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item